Considerations for Loading Data
When loading data into MotherDuck, understanding the trade-offs between different approaches helps you make informed decisions that optimize for your specific use case. This guide explains the key considerations that impact performance, cost, and reliability.
Data Loading Methods and Their Trade-offs
Batch vs. Streaming Approaches
MotherDuck is optimized for batch operations rather than real-time streaming. This fundamental design choice affects how you should approach data loading:
Batch Loading (Recommended)
- Performance: Significantly faster throughput when loading large datasets
- Cost: More efficient use of compute resources and network bandwidth
- Reliability: Better error handling and recovery mechanisms
- Use Case: Data warehousing, analytics, reporting
Streaming/Real-time
- Performance: Suboptimal for small, frequent writes
- Cost: Higher overhead per operation
- Reliability: More complex error handling
- Use Case: Consider using queues or buffering systems in front of MotherDuck
For streaming workloads, use queues to batch writes to tables. While this introduces some latency, the improvement in throughput far outweighs the cost of small writes.
File Format Considerations
The choice of file format significantly impacts loading performance:
Parquet (Recommended)
- Compression: 5-10x better compression than CSV
- Performance: 5-10x more throughput due to compression
- Schema: Self-describing with embedded metadata
- Use Case: Production data loading, large datasets
CSV
- Compression: Minimal compression benefits
- Performance: Slower loading, especially for large files
- Schema: Requires manual type inference or specification
- Use Case: Simple data exploration, small datasets
JSON
- Compression: Moderate compression
- Performance: Slower than Parquet due to parsing overhead
- Schema: Flexible but requires careful type handling
- Use Case: Semi-structured data, API responses
Performance Optimization Strategies
Batch Size Optimization
The size of your data batches directly impacts performance and resource usage:
Optimal Batch Size: 1,000,000+ rows
- DuckDB operates in groups of 122,800 rows (row group size)
- A 1.2M row insert will parallelize across 10 threads automatically
- 100k and 1M row inserts will perform roughly the same due to parallelization overhead
- Minimum effective batch size is >1M rows for optimal performance
Too Small (< 1,000,000 rows)
- Higher overhead per batch due to parallelization setup
- Increased network round trips
- Suboptimal resource utilization
- 100k row batches don't provide meaningful performance benefits
Very Large (> 1,000,000,000 rows)
- Risk of memory issues
- Longer transaction times
- Potential timeout issues
- Consider breaking into multiple 100M row batches
Load data in batches of at least 1M rows to leverage DuckDB's parallelization. Smaller batches (like 100k rows) don't provide meaningful performance benefits and may actually be slower due to overhead.
Memory Management
Effective memory management is crucial for large data loads:
Connection Pooling
- Reuse connections to reduce overhead
- Implement connection recycling (every 15-20 minutes)
- Use appropriate pool sizes based on concurrency needs
Data Type Optimization
- Use explicit schemas to avoid type inference overhead
- Choose appropriate data types (e.g., TIMESTAMP for dates)
- Avoid unnecessary type conversions
Sorting Strategy
- Sort data by frequently queried columns during loading
- To re-sort existing tables, use
CREATE OR REPLACE
with the preferred sorting method
- To re-sort existing tables, use
- Improves query performance through better data locality
- Consider the trade-off between loading speed and query performance
Network and Location Considerations
Data Location
- MotherDuck is hosted in AWS
us-east-1
- Locate source data in the same region for optimal performance
- Consider network latency when loading from remote sources
Cloud Storage Integration
- Direct integration with S3, GCS, Azure Blob Storage
- Leverages cloud network speeds for better performance
- Reduces local storage requirements
Cost Implications
Compute Costs
Instance Selection
- Pulse: Not advised for data loading
- Standard: Good for most data loading workloads
- Jumbo: Better for large, complex transformations during loading
- Consider the 60-second cooldown period when planning batch sizes
Query Optimization
- Monitor query history during large loads
- Use
EXPLAIN
and/orEXPLAIN ANALYZE
to understand execution plans - Optimize to minimize compute time
Reliability and Error Handling
Transaction Management
Transaction Size Limits
- Keep transactions under 1 minute for optimal performance
- Use appropriate batch sizes to avoid timeouts
- Implement retry logic for failed transactions
ACID Compliance
- MotherDuck provides ACID compliance but is not an OLTP system
- Use for analytical workloads, not high-frequency transactional data
- Consider eventual consistency for read scaling scenarios
Data Quality Considerations
Schema Validation
- Use explicit schemas to catch data quality issues early
- Implement data validation before loading
- Consider using data quality tools in your pipeline
Error Recovery
- Implement idempotent loading processes
- Use
CREATE OR REPLACE
for table recreation - Maintain audit trails for troubleshooting
Loading Patterns and Best Practices
Loading from Different Sources
Local Files
- Good for development and testing
- Limited by local network and storage
- Use for smaller datasets or initial exploration
Cloud Storage
- Better performance for large datasets
- Leverages cloud infrastructure
- Supports multiple formats and compression
Database Sources
- Use DuckDB extensions for PostgreSQL/MySQL
- Consider network latency and bandwidth
- Implement appropriate connection pooling
API Sources
- Buffer data before loading to MotherDuck
- Consider rate limits and error handling
- Use appropriate data types for API responses
Monitoring and Troubleshooting
Performance Monitoring
Key Metrics to Track
- Loading time per batch
- Memory usage during loads
- Network throughput
- Error rates and types
Tools and Queries
- Use
PRAGMA database_size
for storage monitoring - Check
query_history
for performance analysis - Monitor connection pool health
Common Issues and Solutions
Memory Issues
- Reduce batch sizes
- Use more efficient data types
- Implement proper connection management
Timeout Issues
- Reduce transaction size
- Optimize network connectivity
- Use appropriate instance types
Storage Issues
- Monitor storage lifecycle stages
- Implement data retention policies
- Optimize data compression
Summary
The key to successful data loading in MotherDuck is understanding the trade-offs between different approaches and optimizing for your specific use case. Focus on:
- Batch operations over streaming for better performance (unless streaming is required)
- If you can control how they are written from sources, Appropriate file formats (Parquet preferred) for compression and speed
- Optimal batch sizes (1,000,000+ rows) to balance memory and throughput
- Proper connection management to avoid resource issues
- Monitoring and optimization to maintain performance over time
By following these guidelines and understanding the underlying principles, you can build efficient, reliable data loading pipelines that scale with your needs while managing costs effectively.